Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android |
| 2020-10-15 | 2019-09-04 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 548.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A90 5G has a global score of 90.5, which is a bit better than Google Pixel 5's 89 score. Galaxy A90 5G's design is older, a lot heavier and just a little thicker than Google Pixel 5. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has just a bit better performance than Google Pixel 5, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Google Pixel 5 features a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2340px resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch in the screen. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a much better memory for applications and games than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has a SD extension slot that allows up to 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G shoots much clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has slower video frame rates and a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a way larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a way better 48 mega pixels resolution back camera.
Galaxy A90 5G counts with a bit longer battery duration than Google Pixel 5, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.