Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-10-15 | 2017-02-24 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 548.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 has an overall score of 89, which is a little bit better than Galaxy C9 Pro's 81 score. Google Pixel 5 is a noticeably newer and lighter phone than the Galaxy C9 Pro, although it's thicker. Google Pixel 5 features a little more vivid display than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Google Pixel 5 also has a little greater display density and a quite better 1080 x 2340 resolution.
Google Pixel 5 counts with a little better performance than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 5 also has more RAM. The Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a bit more storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 5, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 256 GB.
The Google Pixel 5 counts with just a bit longer battery life than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 2 percent more battery capacity. Google Pixel 5 counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a much worse 12.2 mega pixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a bigger aperture for better low-light photography.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.