Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 548.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 has a score of 89, which is better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's overall score of 77.8. Although Google Pixel 5 is extremely older and noticeably thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's body is still a lot lighter. Google Pixel 5 has a much faster processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 8 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a lot better looking display than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a just a little lower screen density, it also counts with a much better 2200 x 2480 resolution and a way larger screen. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 5, because it has more internal storage.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 5, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity against 4080mAh. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a way higher resolution back-facing camera, a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a much higher video quality.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Google Pixel 5 is also a bargain compared to the other phones, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.