Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2021-04-02 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 548.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 is much better than the vivo X60 Pro, having an 89 score against 78.8. Even though the Google Pixel 5 and the vivo X60 Pro were released only 6 months apart, Google Pixel 5's design is somewhat lighter but a little bit thicker than the vivo X60 Pro. Vivo X60 Pro features a little bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has more RAM.
Vivo X60 Pro counts with a screen that's just as good as the Google Pixel 5 one, because although the vivo X60 Pro has a bit lower screen density, it also counts with a little bigger display and a bit higher 1080 x 2376 resolution. The vivo X60 Pro features a superior camera than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light images and videos, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a much higher photo and video quality and a back camera with a way higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
The vivo X60 Pro features a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 5, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity. Vivo X60 Pro features a bit longer battery duration than Google Pixel 5, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.