Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-07-21 | 2020-06-19 |
| 5.99 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| -- | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Glass, Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 449.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 431 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Tensor (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G78 MP20 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4410mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is much better than the Google Pixel 6a, getting a global score of 91.8 against 76.4. Despite of the fact the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is noticeably older and just a little heavier than the Google Pixel 6a, it's body is still just a bit thinner. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has an older 11 version while Google Pixel 6a has Android 12.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel 6a, because although it has a little bit lower pixel amount per inch in the screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a little larger screen. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a much more powerful processor than Google Pixel 6a, and although they both have 6 GB of RAM, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has a greater number of cores.
The Galaxy A71 5G counts with a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 6a, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A71 5G also has an external memory slot that allows up to 1000 GB. Galaxy A71 5G shoots way better videos and photos than Google Pixel 6a, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for taking pictures or videos in poorly lited situations and lower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
The Galaxy A71 5G counts with a battery lifetime that is just as good as the Google Pixel 6a one, although the Galaxy A71 5G also has a 4500mAh battery size.
Galaxy A71 5G is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.