Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 12 | Android 14 |
| 2022-07-21 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.99 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| Glass, Metal and Plastic | -- |
| $ 449.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 431 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Tensor (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G78 MP20 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 6.12 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4410mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has an overall score of 77.8, which is a bit better than the Google Pixel 6a's global score of 76.4. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS (operating system), but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a newer 14 version while Google Pixel 6a has Android 12, so it gives a couple nice extra features and increased performance. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a newer and noticeably thinner cellphone than the Google Pixel 6a, but it's somewhat heavier.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a lot better display than Google Pixel 6a, because although it has a little bit inferior amount of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a way bigger screen and a way higher 2200 x 2480px resolution. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a bit faster processing unit than Google Pixel 6a, because it has more RAM and more MHz cpu cores.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a superior storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 6a, because it has more internal memory capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better camera than Google Pixel 6a, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a lot higher video definition and a camera with a much higher 50 mega-pixels resolution.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features superior battery life than Google Pixel 6a, because it has a 5700mAh battery size instead of 4410mAh.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than Google Pixel 6a, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 6a. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy vivo X Fold 3 Pro, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Google Pixel 6a, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.