Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| -- | 2018-08-27 |
| -- | 6.39 x 3.03 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 6.74 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Glass and Metal |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2480 x 220 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 311 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, getting an 82.2 score against 82.1. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored)'s body is noticeably thinner and a lot lighter than the Samsung Galaxy A8 Star. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS (Operating System), but the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has the previous 14 version while Samsung Galaxy A8 Star has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Galaxy A8 Star has a much faster processing unit than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has 10 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Samsung Galaxy A8 Star has a better looking display than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a greater number of pixels per inch in the display and a way higher 1080 x 2220 pixels resolution.
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) features a greater memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A8 Star, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) features longer battery duration than Galaxy A8 Star, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) takes slightly better videos and photos than Galaxy A8 Star, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) also has higher 60 frames per second video frame rate and a camera in the back with much more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.