Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 15 | -- |
| -- | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.09 x 2.88 x 0.35 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.04 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 431 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Google Tensor G3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Immortalis-G715s MC10 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| -- | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 1.36 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), having a global score of 81.6 against 75.7. The Google Pixel 2 has a really superior performance than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), because although it has 4 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with more processing cores. Google Pixel 2 counts with a bit more vivid display than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), because although it has a little lower 1080 x 1920 resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite greater quantity of pixels per inch in the display.
Google Pixel 9a (Rumored) takes slightly better photos and videos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same video quality, the Google Pixel 9a (Rumored) also has higher video frame rates and a back camera with much more mega-pixels. Google Pixel 2 has as much storage for applications and games as the Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), both of them have the same internal storage.
The Google Pixel 2 has a very superior battery duration than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored).
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.