Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 15 | Android |
| -- | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.09 x 2.88 x 0.35 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| -- | 7.23 ounces |
| -- | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | TFT |
| 431 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Google Tensor G3 (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Immortalis-G715s MC10 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.23 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| -- | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 1.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 is better than the Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), getting an 84.7 score against 75.7. Galaxy A32 comes with Android operating system, while Google Pixel 9a (Rumored) works with Android 15 operating system. Galaxy A32 counts with a very superior CPU than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), because although it has lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a greater number of cores.
Google Pixel 9a (Rumored) features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A32, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a lot more pixels per inch in the screen and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2400. Galaxy A32 has a very superior memory for applications and games than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
Galaxy A32 counts with a way better battery life than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored). The Galaxy A32 has a bit better camera than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), although it has slower video frame rates, they both have a back facing camera with a 48 MP resolution and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.