Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.09 x 2.88 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 6.53 ounces |
| -- | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 431 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Google Tensor G3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Immortalis-G715s MC10 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| -- | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 1.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is much better than the Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), with a global score of 91.8 against 75.7. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has an older 11 version while Google Pixel 9a (Rumored) has Android 15 version. Galaxy A71 5G has a much faster processor than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), because although it has lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of cores.
Galaxy A71 5G features a little sharper screen than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), because although it has a little bit worse display density, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a quite bigger screen. Galaxy A71 5G features a very superior memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A71 5G also has an external SD slot that allows up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy A71 5G captures better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution, the Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a back facing camera with much more mega pixels. The Galaxy A71 5G counts with a very superior battery duration than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored).
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.