Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| 2016-10-20 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gray | Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 869.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone X is a little bit better than Google Pixel XL, with an 88.1 score against 81.3. The iPhone X design is newer and thinner, but also just a little bit heavier than the Google Pixel XL. The iPhone X has a more powerful CPU than Google Pixel XL, because although it has lesser RAM, it also counts with a higher number of cores (and faster) and a 64 bits processor.
IPhone X counts with a little bit better screen than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a just a bit lower pixel number in each inch in the display and a bit lower resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels, it also counts with a little bit larger screen. IPhone X features just a bit better camera than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a lot tinier sensor taking way lower quality photos, a camera with less megapixels and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low light captures and videos.
IPhone X has a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel XL, because it has 128 GB more internal storage. The Google Pixel XL counts with longer battery life than iPhone X, because it has 3450mAh of battery capacity instead of 2716mAh.
The iPhone X is more expensive than the Google Pixel XL, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.