Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2016-10-20 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gray | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 869.00 | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel XL has a general score of 81.3, which is a bit better than the LG G7 ThinQ's 81 global score. The Google Pixel XL is an older, a little heavier and just a little bit thicker phone than the LG G7 ThinQ. LG G7 ThinQ features a sharper screen than Google Pixel XL, because it has a slightly higher 1440 x 3120 resolution, a just a little more pixels per inch of display and a bit larger display.
The LG G7 ThinQ has just a little better performance than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the LG G7 ThinQ also has more cores. The LG G7 ThinQ features a little bit better camera than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a lot smaller camera sensor taking way worse quality videos and images, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the LG G7 ThinQ also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to take better images and video in low light environments, a back-facing camera with a way better 16 mega-pixels resolution and better video frame rates.
The LG G7 ThinQ has a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel XL, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Google Pixel XL features a little better battery duration than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 3450mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Although Google Pixel XL is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG G7 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG G7 ThinQ. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Google Pixel XL, else you can save some money and get the LG G7 ThinQ, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.