Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-10-20 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gray | Holographic white |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 869.00 | $ 233.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel XL has a score of 81.3, which is a little bit better than LG Stylo 6's 76.7 overall score. Google Pixel XL is a notably lighter cellphone than the LG Stylo 6, but both are equally thin. Google Pixel XL has a slightly better screen than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a bit higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
LG Stylo 6 has a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel XL, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG Stylo 6 counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the LG Stylo 6 also has a larger number of cores.
The Google Pixel XL takes clearer videos and photos than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a back camera with a worse 12.3 MP resolution and a tinier aperture, it also counts with a way bigger back camera sensor and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution. The LG Stylo 6 features just a bit longer battery life than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 16 percent greater battery size.
Although Google Pixel XL is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG Stylo 6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG Stylo 6. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Google Pixel XL, otherwise you can save some money and get the LG Stylo 6, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.