Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2016-10-20 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gray | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 869.00 | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.6 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel XL has a general score of 81.3, which is slightly better than LG V10's score of 78.6. The Google Pixel XL is a lighter cellphone than the LG V10, but they have the same thickness. LG V10 features a little more vivid display than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch in the display, and they both have an equal 2560 x 1440 resolution, the LG V10 also counts with a little larger screen.
The Google Pixel XL has just a bit better performance than LG V10, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Google Pixel XL also has a larger number of cores. LG V10 shoots slightly better pictures and videos than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor capturing lower quality pictures, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the LG V10 also counts with a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light images, better 120 fps video frame rates and a way more mega pixels back-facing camera.
LG V10 has a very superior storage for applications and games than Google Pixel XL, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Google Pixel XL counts with just a bit longer battery duration than LG V10, because it has a 3450mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Although Google Pixel XL is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG V10, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG V10. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Google Pixel XL, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the LG V10, letting go a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.