Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2016-10-20 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gray | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 869.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ is just a bit better than Google Pixel XL, getting a general score of 82.5 against 81.3. LG V30S ThinQ's body is newer, a little lighter and thinner than Google Pixel XL. The LG V30S ThinQ has a bit better performance than Google Pixel XL, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a larger number of cores.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a bit more vivid display than Google Pixel XL, because it has a quite better screen pixels density, a little higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and a little bit larger display. LG V30S ThinQ features a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Google Pixel XL features a little better battery lifetime than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 3450mAh of battery capacity. The LG V30S ThinQ takes slightly better photos and videos than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a lot tinier back-facing camera sensor, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the LG V30S ThinQ also counts with a much more MP back-facing camera and a bigger aperture.
The LG V30S ThinQ is a bit more expensive than Google Pixel XL, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.