Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| 2016-10-20 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gray | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 869.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel XL is a little bit better than the LG V35 ThinQ, with an 81.3 score against 81.3. Google Pixel XL is better than the LG V35 ThinQ, it must be told that it is also older, a little bit heavier and thicker. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit sharper display than Google Pixel XL, because it has a slightly better 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution, a bit more pixels per inch in the display and a little bit larger display.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a little faster processing unit than Google Pixel XL, because it has 2 GB more RAM memory and a larger number of cores. LG V35 ThinQ has much more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel XL, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The LG V35 ThinQ takes clearer photographs and videos than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a much smaller sensor taking less light and washed colors, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video definition, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a larger aperture and a back facing camera with lot more MP.
The Google Pixel XL features a little longer battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 5 percent bigger battery size.
Although Google Pixel XL is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG V35 ThinQ. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Google Pixel XL, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the LG V35 ThinQ, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.