Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-10-20 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gray | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 869.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel XL is a bit better than the LG V40 ThinQ, getting a score of 81.3 against 81.2. Google Pixel XL is an older and somewhat thicker cellphone than LG V40 ThinQ, but Google managed to build it just a bit lighter anyway. LG V40 ThinQ has a slightly better display than Google Pixel XL, because it has a bit greater count of pixels per display inch, a bigger screen and a little higher resolution of 1440 x 3120.
The LG V40 ThinQ has just a bit better processing power than Google Pixel XL, because it has a higher number of cores (and faster) and 2 GB more RAM. The LG V40 ThinQ shoots clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 video definition, a camera with lesser MP and a smaller back camera sensor, it also counts with a lot bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light photography and video.
LG V40 ThinQ features much more memory for games and applications than Google Pixel XL, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Google Pixel XL has just a bit better battery life than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 5 percent larger battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel XL is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG V40 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG V40 ThinQ. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Google Pixel XL, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the LG V40 ThinQ, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.