Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| 2016-10-20 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gray | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 869.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is a little bit better than the Google Pixel XL, getting a global score of 87.1 against 81.3. Although LG Velvet is a bit heavier than the Google Pixel XL, it's a little thinner and also newer. LG Velvet has a little faster processor than Google Pixel XL, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and more CPU cores.
Google Pixel XL features a little sharper display than LG Velvet, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a better quantity of pixels per screen inch. LG Velvet features a superior camera than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the LG Velvet also has a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a camera with lot more mega-pixels and a bigger camera aperture to capture better captures and videos in low-light environments.
The LG Velvet features a much better memory for games and applications than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the LG Velvet also has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG Velvet counts with greater battery duration than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 25 percent greater battery capacity.
The LG Velvet not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.