Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2016-10-20 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.00 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gray | Interstellar Black and Starlight White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 869.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1250 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 14.96 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel XL is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, with a overall score of 81.3 against 80.9. The Google Pixel XL is a notably older and just a little thicker phone than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, but Google was able to build it lighter anyway. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a bit better looking screen than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a way lower display density, it also counts with a bigger display.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has as much storage capacity for apps and games as the Google Pixel XL, both have the same 128 GB internal memory. Google Pixel XL features a really superior processing power than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has less RAM, it also counts with a greater number of cores (and also faster).
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a very superior camera than Google Pixel XL, because it has a lot better 7680x4320 video quality, a lot larger camera sensor, a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photography and video and a camera in the back with way more megapixels. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a superior battery performance than Google Pixel XL, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.