Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2016-10-20 | 2023-09-14 |
| 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gray | Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 869.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel XL is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo, with an 81.3 score against 77. The Google Pixel XL is a noticeably older and just a little thicker device than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo, but Google managed to build it a little bit lighter anyway. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo has a slightly better screen than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a little bit inferior pixels count in each display inch and a little bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a bigger screen.
The Google Pixel XL counts with a lot better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM and 4 less processing cores. Google Pixel XL and Motorola Edge 40 Neo feature very similar memory for applications and games, both of them have the same internal storage capacity.
Motorola Edge 40 Neo features a way better camera than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo also has a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light captures, a back camera with lot more MP and a much bigger sensor taking much better quality videos and photographs.
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo counts with a way better battery performance than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3450mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.