Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-10-20 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gray | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 869.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Neo is just a bit better than Google Pixel XL, with a score of 81.9 against 81.3. Motorola Edge 50 Neo's construction is notably newer and a bit thinner, but just a little heavier than the Google Pixel XL. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a much better looking display than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a little worse 1256 x 2760 resolution and a bit less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a bigger screen.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a superior storage for applications and games than Google Pixel XL, because it has more internal memory capacity. The Google Pixel XL has a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has an inferior number of cores (although they are faster) and 4 GB lesser RAM memory.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features superior battery duration than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 25% bigger battery size. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a much better camera than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a larger camera aperture to take better images in low-light environments, a way bigger sensor providing a lot better image quality and a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.