Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-10-20 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gray | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 869.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel XL has a general score of 81.3, which is a little bit better than Motorola One Hyper's general score of 79.8. The Google Pixel XL construction is just a bit thinner and lighter than Motorola One Hyper, although it was released many years before. The Google Pixel XL has a bit better looking display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a greater pixels count in each inch of display.
The Motorola One Hyper features a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Motorola One Hyper also has an external SD slot that allows up to 1000 GB. Motorola One Hyper counts with a bit faster processor than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Motorola One Hyper also has a higher number of cores.
The Motorola One Hyper takes much clearer photographs and videos than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola One Hyper also has a much higher resolution camera and a bigger diafragm aperture.
The Motorola One Hyper features a bit longer battery duration than Google Pixel XL, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel XL is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola One Hyper, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola One Hyper. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get the Motorola One Hyper, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.