Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2016-10-20 | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gray | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 869.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel XL is a bit better than Motorola One Zoom, getting a score of 81.3 against 80. The Google Pixel XL is an incredibly older cellphone than Motorola One Zoom, but it's somewhat lighter and just a bit thinner anyway. The Google Pixel XL has a bit more vivid screen than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a higher pixel density.
Motorola One Zoom features a bit more powerful CPU than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Motorola One Zoom also has 4 more processing cores. Motorola One Zoom features a superior storage for games and applications than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Motorola One Zoom also has an external memory slot that supports up to 128 GB.
The Motorola One Zoom has a much better camera than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Motorola One Zoom also has a camera with lot more MP, a larger camera aperture and a bigger camera sensor providing a better image quality.
Motorola One Zoom counts with just a little better battery performance than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 16 percent larger battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel XL is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola One Zoom, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola One Zoom. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the Motorola One Zoom, and give up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.