Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-10-20 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gray | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 869.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is a little bit better than Google Pixel XL, getting a score of 87 against 81.3. Even though the Motorola razr (2020) is somewhat heavier than the Google Pixel XL, it's just a bit thinner and also extremely newer. The Google Pixel XL features a slightly better looking screen than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better screen density.
The Motorola razr (2020) has a little bit better performance than Google Pixel XL, because it has a greater number of cores and more RAM. Motorola razr (2020) takes much clearer videos and photos than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a bigger aperture to capture better low light photography and videos, a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back facing camera with a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
Motorola razr (2020) has a lot bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel XL, because it has 128 GB more internal storage. Google Pixel XL counts with improved battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 3450mAh of battery capacity.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Google Pixel XL, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Google Pixel XL. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy the Google Pixel XL, letting go a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.