Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-10-20 | 2020-11-12 |
| 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gray | Meteor grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 869.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel XL is a bit better than the Nokia 8 V 5G UW, with a score of 81.3 against 80.3. Even though Google Pixel XL is older than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, it's body is incredibly lighter and a bit thinner. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a bit faster CPU than Google Pixel XL, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a greater number of cores (and they are faster).
The Google Pixel XL counts with a slightly better screen than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better pixel count per inch of display. Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with a much bigger storage for games and applications than Google Pixel XL, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW has better battery lifetime than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 30 percent larger battery capacity. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW takes way better videos and photos than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has a way bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, better video frame rate, a larger diafragm aperture and a back camera with lot more MP.
Although Google Pixel XL is a better device, it is more expensive than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Nokia 8 V 5G UW. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Google Pixel XL, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Nokia 8 V 5G UW, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.