Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2016-10-20 | 2021-07-02 |
| 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gray | Black, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 869.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel XL is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A22, getting a global score of 81.3 against 76.1. Despite of the fact Google Pixel XL is notably older and a bit thicker than the Samsung Galaxy A22, it's design is still a little lighter. Google Pixel XL counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy A22, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a way higher screen pixels density.
Galaxy A22 features a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel XL, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A22 features a bit better processor than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Samsung Galaxy A22 also has a higher number of cores (although they are slower).
The Google Pixel XL features a way better battery performance than Galaxy A22. The Google Pixel XL takes a little bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A22, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for capturing pictures and/or video in poorly lited environments and a back facing camera with a way lower 12.3 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.