Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-10-20 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gray | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 869.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel XL is a little bit better than Galaxy A25 5G, having an 81.3 score against 79.9. Despite of the fact Google Pixel XL is older and a little thicker than the Galaxy A25 5G, it's design is still somewhat lighter. Google Pixel XL features a really superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, although it has 4 less CPU cores (but faster) and a lower amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy A25 5G has just a bit better looking display than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a way lower pixel quantity per inch in the screen and a bit worse 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger screen. The Galaxy A25 5G has a lot bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A25 5G also has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
Galaxy A25 5G features a much longer battery life than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 45% bigger battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G shoots much better photographs and videos than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor capturing less light and washed colors, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a back facing camera with much more megapixels and a bigger aperture for better captures and videos in poorly lited environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.