Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-10-20 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gray | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 869.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a general score of 90.8, which is much better than Google Pixel XL's score of 81.3. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is a heavier phone than the Google Pixel XL, but both of them are 0.34inches thick. The Google Pixel XL features a little sharper display than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution and a better pixel amount in each inch of screen.
Galaxy A51 5G counts with a little faster processing unit than Google Pixel XL, because it has more RAM memory and a higher number of cores. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a superior camera than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, a F2 aperture and the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has a way more mega-pixels camera in the back and a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking better quality photographs and videos.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has superior battery performance than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Galaxy A51 5G not only is the best devices in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.