Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2016-10-20 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gray | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 869.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is better than the Google Pixel XL, getting a 91.3 score against 81.3. Even though Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is heavier than Google Pixel XL, it's a little thinner and newer. Google Pixel XL has a bit better display than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560.
Galaxy A52 5G counts with much more storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy A52 5G also has an external memory slot that allows up to 1 TB. Galaxy A52 5G counts with a bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel XL, because it has 2 GB more RAM and a larger number of faster cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has greater battery performance than Google Pixel XL, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels, a way bigger camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and photos and a bigger aperture to take better captures in poorly lited situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.