Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-10-20 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gray | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 869.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel XL is just a bit better than Galaxy A70, with a general score of 81.3 against 76.9. Even though the Google Pixel XL is much older and a little thicker than the Galaxy A70, it's design is still just a bit lighter. Samsung Galaxy A70 features just a little better processing power than Google Pixel XL, because it has more cpu cores and 2 GB more RAM memory.
Google Pixel XL features just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A70, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 2560px resolution. Google Pixel XL takes a lot better photos and videos than Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for capturing photos and video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Google Pixel XL also counts with a bigger sensor providing a higher image quality.
Galaxy A70 counts with a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A70 also has a SD card slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Galaxy A70 has better battery lifetime than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Although Google Pixel XL is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Galaxy A70, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy A70. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Google Pixel XL, else you can save some dollars and get the Galaxy A70, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.