Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-10-20 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gray | Prism bricks black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 869.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is much better than Google Pixel XL, with a global score of 92.9 against 81.3. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a noticeably newer and just a little thinner phone than the Google Pixel XL, but it is also somewhat heavier. The Google Pixel XL has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a better screen pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a much bigger memory for applications and games than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has an external memory slot that admits up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a bit more powerful processing unit than Google Pixel XL, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW captures much clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a much bigger sensor capturing way better quality photos, a way more MP camera in the back and a bigger aperture.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with better battery duration than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 30 percent greater battery capacity.
Galaxy A71 5G UW not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.