Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-10-20 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gray | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 869.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 is slightly better than Google Pixel XL, with a global score of 88.1 against 81.3. Although Galaxy F62 is noticeably newer than the Google Pixel XL, it's a bit thicker and incredibly heavier. The Galaxy F62 counts with a little better performance than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy F62 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel XL features a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher screen pixels density and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1 TB.
The Galaxy F62 shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy F62 also has a bigger aperture, a camera in the back with much more mega pixels and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a much better battery performance than Google Pixel XL, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.