Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2016-10-20 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gray | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 869.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel XL is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy M20, getting an 81.3 score against 78.9. Google Pixel XL's body is a bit thinner and just a bit lighter than Samsung Galaxy M20, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. Google Pixel XL has a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a better display pixel density.
The Galaxy M20 counts with a processor that's very similar to the Google Pixel XL one, and although the Galaxy M20 has a higher number of cores , they both have the same RAM amount. Samsung Galaxy M20 counts with a better memory to store more apps and games than Google Pixel XL, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 512 GB.
Galaxy M20 counts with a superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3450mAh. Google Pixel XL shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy M20, because although it has a camera in the back with a lower resolution and a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a lot bigger sensor and a lot higher video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.