Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2016-10-20 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gray | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 869.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 has a score of 90.8, which is better than Google Pixel XL's overall score of 81.3. Galaxy Note 20's construction is extremely newer and a little bit thinner, but somewhat heavier than the Google Pixel XL. Galaxy Note 20 features a bit better processing unit than Google Pixel XL, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and 4 more processing cores.
Google Pixel XL features just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher screen density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has as much storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos as the Google Pixel XL one, both of them have the same 128 GB internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 captures clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a less mega pixels camera, it also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a larger diafragm aperture for better low light captures and videos and a way larger back camera sensor taking lot higher quality photographs.
The Galaxy Note 20 features improved battery lifetime than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 4300mAh battery size.
Galaxy Note 20 is more expensive than the Google Pixel XL, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.