Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2016-10-20 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gray | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 869.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than the Google Pixel XL, with a 98.9 score against 81.3. Even though the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is somewhat heavier than the Google Pixel XL, it's a little bit thinner and also way newer. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a quite superior processing power than Google Pixel XL, because it has more RAM memory and a higher number of faster cores.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with just a bit better looking screen than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a little bit lower pixel density, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px and a bigger display. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has an external memory slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has superior battery life than Google Pixel XL, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes much clearer photographs and videos than Google Pixel XL, because it has a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photos and videos, a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a much bigger sensor shooting way better quality videos and photos and a much higher resolution back camera.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra costs a lot more than Google Pixel XL, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.