Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2016-10-20 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gray | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 869.00 | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 5.44 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel XL is a little bit better than the Galaxy Note 3, with an 81.3 score against 81.2. Google Pixel XL's body has the same weight than Galaxy Note 3, but it's a little thicker. Galaxy Note 3 has a slightly better display than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a lot lower display pixel density and a way worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a little better performance than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 also counts with an extra graphics processor. The Google Pixel XL counts with a little bit more storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Google Pixel XL takes a little bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has a back facing camera with a worse resolution and a lower (4K) video quality, it also counts with a larger aperture for better low-light captures and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting much better quality videos and photos.
Google Pixel XL features just a little better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has an 8 percent greater battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel XL is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy Note 3, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy Note 3. If you want to save some dollars, you can get Galaxy Note 3, letting go a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.