Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2016-10-20 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gray | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 869.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has an overall score of 89.7, which is better than the Google Pixel XL's 81.3 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite construction is a lot newer and just a bit thinner, but just a little bit heavier than the Google Pixel XL. Galaxy S10 Lite has a little faster processor than Google Pixel XL, because it has a greater number of cores (and they are faster) and more RAM memory.
Google Pixel XL has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better display density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a much better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy S10 Lite has improved battery lifetime than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3450mAh. The Galaxy S10 Lite features a very superior camera than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and a F2 aperture, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a camera with much more megapixels, a larger camera sensor capturing higher quality photos and faster 60 fps video frame rate.
The Galaxy S10 Lite not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.