Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-10-20 | -- |
| 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | -- |
| 5.93 ounces | -- |
| Black, Blue and Gray | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 869.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 is a little bit better than Google Pixel XL, having an 82.6 score against 81.3. Samsung Galaxy S25's body is extremely thinner and incredibly lighter than Google Pixel XL. The Galaxy S25 features a more vivid display than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a bit worse screen pixel density and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a little larger display.
The Google Pixel XL and the Galaxy S25 have incredibly similar storage to install games and applications, both of them have equal internal storage capacity. The Google Pixel XL features a much greater processing power than Galaxy S25, although it has a lower number of cores and 4 GB lesser RAM. The Galaxy S25 counts with a way better camera than Google Pixel XL, because it has a camera with way more mega-pixels, a larger aperture to capture better photography in poorly lited environments, a lot larger camera sensor taking way better quality videos and pictures and a much higher video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S25 features a little longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel XL, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S25 not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.