Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-10-20 | -- |
| 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | -- |
| 5.93 ounces | -- |
| Black, Blue and Gray | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 869.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has an overall score of 90.7, which is better than the Google Pixel XL's 81.3 global score. Galaxy S25 Ultra is a extremely lighter and thinner cellphone than Google Pixel XL. The Galaxy S25 Ultra features a brighter screen than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a little worse pixel quantity in each inch of screen, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels and a larger screen.
Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel XL, because it has 256 GB internal memory. The Google Pixel XL features a really superior hardware performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a lower number of cores (but faster) and less RAM.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra captures way better pictures and videos than Google Pixel XL, because it has a camera with a much better resolution, a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition, a larger aperture to take better photography and videos in poorly lited situations and a much larger camera sensor. Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel XL, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3450mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.