Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2016-10-20 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gray | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 869.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip has a global score of 88.5, which is a little bit better than Google Pixel XL's 81.3 global score. The Galaxy Z Flip body is notably newer and somewhat thinner than the Google Pixel XL's, although it is also just a bit heavier. The Google Pixel XL features a little bit better screen than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher screen density and a little higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
The Galaxy Z Flip counts with just a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel XL, because it has a larger amount of RAM and more cpu cores. The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Google Pixel XL, because it has more internal memory capacity. The Google Pixel XL counts with a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 3450mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip takes clearer photographs and videos than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a smaller sensor capturing less light and duller colors, a camera in the back with a worse resolution and a worse video resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better low-light images and video.
The Galaxy Z Flip costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel XL, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.