Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-10-20 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gray | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 869.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a score of 94.6, which is much better than the Google Pixel XL's 81.3 global score. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 design is noticeably newer and much thinner, but also noticeably heavier than Google Pixel XL. Google Pixel XL has a bit better screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a much smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1440 x 2560px, it also counts with a higher display density.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel XL, because it has more internal memory. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a quite superior performance than Google Pixel XL, because it has more RAM and 4 more cpu cores. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a slightly better camera than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a less megapixels resolution back camera and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, it also counts with a way bigger sensor shooting lot better quality photographs and a larger aperture.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 features greater battery performance than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 30% larger battery capacity.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel XL, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.