Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-10-20 | 2021-04-20 |
| 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gray | Marine Blue and Moondust Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 869.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel XL has a general score of 81.3, which is a little bit better than TCL 20 Pro 5G's 76.1 general score. Google Pixel XL is an a lot older phone than TCL 20 Pro 5G, but Google managed to build it just a little bit thinner and lighter anyway. The TCL 20 Pro 5G has a bit faster processor than Google Pixel XL, because it has 4 more CPU cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel XL counts with a little sharper display than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution and a better screen pixel density. TCL 20 Pro 5G captures much clearer videos and photos than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the TCL 20 Pro 5G also has a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photography and videos in poorly lited environments, a lot more megapixels back camera and a larger sensor capturing higher quality videos and photographs.
The TCL 20 Pro 5G has a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel XL, because it has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB and 256 GB internal memory capacity. TCL 20 Pro 5G features longer battery performance than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 30% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.