Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 90.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-10-20 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gray | Blasting black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 869.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 484 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is better than the Google Pixel XL, getting a 90.1 score against 81.3. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro's construction is extremely newer than the Google Pixel XL's, but it's somewhat thicker and incredibly heavier. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a little faster processor than Google Pixel XL, because it has more RAM memory and a greater number of cores.
The Google Pixel XL and the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro have similar screens, because although the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a quite lower screen density, it also counts with a larger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro takes much clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has a bigger aperture, a camera with lot more mega pixels, a much larger back-facing camera sensor and faster video frame rate.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel XL, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a much better battery performance than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.