Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| 2016-10-20 | 2018-04-03 |
| 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gray | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 869.00 | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is slightly better than the Google Pixel XL, getting an 83.8 score against 81.3. Even though the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is heavier than Google Pixel XL, it's just a little bit thinner and newer. Google Pixel XL features a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and more pixels per inch in the display.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel XL, because it has more RAM and a larger number of faster cores. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features a camera that's very similar to Google Pixel XL's camera, because although the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a back facing camera with a worse resolution and a tinier sensor taking less light and washed colors, it also counts with a larger aperture for better captures in poorly lited environments.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a way bigger memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel XL, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Google Pixel XL has just a bit better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has 3450mAh of battery capacity against 3400mAh.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is also very cheap compared to the other ones, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.