Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 80.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-10-20 | 2020-05-09 |
| 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.21 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gray | Glacier white, Midnight black and Nebula purple |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 869.00 | $ 377.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5260mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel XL is a bit better than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, getting a global score of 81.3 against 80.6. Although Google Pixel XL is extremely older than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, it's construction is lighter and somewhat thinner. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite features a little faster processor than Google Pixel XL, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a higher number of cores.
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite features a screen that's very similar to Google Pixel XL's screen, because although the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite has a much lower pixel amount per inch in the screen and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a bigger screen. Google Pixel XL has a much bigger memory to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, because it has 128 GB internal memory.
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite shoots much better pictures and videos than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite also has a way bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a larger aperture for better low-light photography and video and a much higher resolution camera.
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel XL, because it has 5260mAh of battery capacity instead of 3450mAh.
Although Google Pixel XL is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Google Pixel XL, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.