Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-10-20 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gray | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 869.00 | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel XL has a general score of 81.3, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9's 76.6 general score. Although Google Pixel XL is extremely older than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, it's construction is lighter and a bit thinner. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 features just a bit better processing power than Google Pixel XL, because although it has less RAM memory, it also counts with a greater number of cores (but slower).
Google Pixel XL features a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher display pixels density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a much better camera than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also has a back camera with much more MP, a bigger camera aperture to take better captures and video in low light situations and a larger sensor taking better quality videos and photographs.
The Google Pixel XL has a bit more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal storage. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 features a really longer battery performance than Google Pixel XL, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel XL is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Google Pixel XL, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, letting go a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.