Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| -- | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2016-10-20 | 2019-09-20 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 11 Pro has a general score of 84.9, which is just a bit better than the Google Pixel's 80.2 general score. IPhone 11 Pro is a notably newer and a little thinner cellphone than the Google Pixel, but it is incredibly heavier. The iPhone 11 Pro features a more vivid screen than Google Pixel, because it has a bit higher 1125 x 2436 resolution, a larger display and a bit higher quantity of pixels in each inch of screen.
The iPhone 11 Pro features a better hardware performance than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the iPhone 11 Pro also has a 64-bit processor and 2 more cores. Google Pixel features a lot bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone 11 Pro, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The iPhone 11 Pro features a bit longer battery duration than Google Pixel, because it has a 10 percent greater battery capacity. The iPhone 11 Pro shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Google Pixel, because although it has a back facing camera with a lower 12 megapixels resolution, a worse (4K) video resolution and a smaller camera sensor shooting lower quality videos and photos, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photography.
Although Apple iPhone 11 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than Google Pixel, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Apple iPhone 11 Pro, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Google Pixel, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.