Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| 2016-10-20 | 2016-09-29 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel is slightly better than LG V20, having a overall score of 80.2 against 77. Although the Google Pixel and the LG V20 were released with only 1 months difference, Google Pixel's design is somewhat lighter but also thicker than the LG V20. The Google Pixel and the LG V20 both count with similar processors, both of them have a 4 GB RAM memory and a Quad-Core processor.
LG V20 has a little more vivid display than Google Pixel, because it has a just a little higher amount of pixels per screen inch, a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a quite bigger screen. The LG V20 has much more memory capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V20 has a slightly better camera than Google Pixel, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rates, the LG V20 also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better photos and videos in low-light situations and a lot better resolution camera.
The LG V20 has superior battery life than Google Pixel, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG V20. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get LG V20, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.