Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-10-20 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is slightly better than Google Pixel, with a overall score of 83.7 against 80.2. LG V50 ThinQ's design is newer and just a bit thinner, but also a lot heavier than the Google Pixel. The LG V50 ThinQ has a bit better looking screen than Google Pixel, because it has a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3120, a just a little higher pixels quantity in each inch in the screen and a bigger screen.
LG V50 ThinQ has a bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel, because it has 2 GB more RAM memory and a greater number of faster cores. LG V50 ThinQ features a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the LG V50 ThinQ also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
LG V50 ThinQ takes a bit better videos and photos than Google Pixel, because although it has a lower video quality, a camera in the back with lesser MP resolution and a smaller back-facing camera sensor shooting lower quality videos and images, it also counts with a way larger aperture. The LG V50 ThinQ has a really longer battery duration than Google Pixel, because it has a 44 percent more battery size.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, LG V50 ThinQ is also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.