Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2016-10-20 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel is slightly better than Motorola Droid Turbo, with a general score of 80.2 against 76.4. The Google Pixel body is newer, extremely thinner and lighter than the Motorola Droid Turbo. Motorola Droid Turbo has a bit more powerful processing unit than Google Pixel, because although it has lesser RAM, and they both have a Quad-Core CPU, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with an extra graphics processor.
Motorola Droid Turbo has a much better looking display than Google Pixel, because it has a little bit larger screen, a better count of pixels per inch of screen and a better 2560 x 1440px resolution. Google Pixel features a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 128 GB internal storage.
The Motorola Droid Turbo has a really longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel, because it has a 41% larger battery capacity. The Motorola Droid Turbo captures clearer videos and photos than Google Pixel, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same video definition and the same diafragm aperture, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a back camera with a much higher 20.7 megapixels resolution.
Although Google Pixel is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Droid Turbo. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the Motorola Droid Turbo, giving up a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.